🗺 Every page — the whole flow
The votes
Open questionsElections — when, where, howVoter turnoutPriorities boardWhat came of itGet involved
The budget
▶ Take the 2-minute tourThe money trailYour tax bill, explainedGrants — money we could go getWho gets paidWhat the auditors reportedThe receipt — arithmetic checkedThe documentsHow every number is sourcedQuestions people ask — answered from the dataThe plain-words tour
Public needs
Our waterJails & prisons — from holding to buildingWho’s watching — cameras, plate readers, the rulesWho to call — county and state officesFind help
Dead ends & open questions
The docketThe calendarHow complete is this county?
Research for a better county
Receipts by railsFood sovereigntyGrow-opsThe food flywheelThe two potsFeeding the countyThe growing frontierThe grower’s almanacThe $400K blueprintThe research shelfThe precedents
The wider network
All countiesKindred workWhere we sit in the field
How to trust this
Where we standWhat we will never doHow this is securedThe traffic logOur storyReport a problem
Pike County, Arkansas · the evidence library

Where this has been tried

The stance this platform takes is not a theory — it has been tried, in places large and small, for centuries and for decades. These are the cases we learn from: what happened, what the evidence shows, what each one teaches a county of 21,000 — including the case where direct democracy struggles, because a stance that hides its counterexamples isn't a stance, it's a pitch.
The New England town meeting

New England, United States · 1630s — present

Direct local self-government is not an innovation to be piloted; it is a heritage to be extended.

Switzerland — voting as a habit

Switzerland, national and communal · 1291 / 1848 — present

Frequency normalizes participation.

vTaiwan — finding the hidden majority

Taiwan · 2015 — present

Comment sections amplify fights because replies reward them.

Porto Alegre — where residents moved the money

Porto Alegre, Brazil (1.3M people) · 1989 — 2004 (peak years)

Both halves.

Better Reykjavik — half a city, one website

Reykjavik, Iceland (120,000 people) · 2010 — present

The loop is the product.

Decidim — infrastructure that spread

Barcelona, Spain — then hundreds of institutions · 2016 — present

Build the kernel once, isolate the local specifics in configuration, give it away — a second county should be a config file and a folder of PDFs.

Deliberative polling — what happens to people who participate

Stanford / worldwide (100+ polls in 50+ countries) · 1988 — present

The deepest return on participation isn't any single result — it's what taking part does to the participant.

Lahti — voting at the library

Lahti, Finland · 2020s

Hybrid isn't an accessibility gesture; it is what makes results representative enough to cite.

Washington County, Wisconsin — a small county moves real money

Washington County, Wisconsin (~137,000 people) · 2020s

The quorum court is not too small to act on demonstrated priorities; small is where it's most possible.

UK Parliament petitions — traction that guarantees an answer

United Kingdom · 2015 — present

A county platform cannot obligate officials — and doesn't need to.

Tupelo, Mississippi — the poorest county becomes the marvel

Tupelo / Lee County, Mississippi · 1940s — present

The closest analog to a small rural county in the whole library: a place with no natural advantages that changed its trajectory through organized community structures and a local institution keeping score in public.

Chattanooga — from dirtiest city to National Park City, starting with 1,700 residents

Chattanooga, Tennessee · 1969 — present

Mass participation isn't the celebration after a turnaround — in the best-documented American case, it was the ignition.

The Promise towns — Kalamazoo, El Dorado, and Arkadelphia itself

Kalamazoo, MI · El Dorado, AR · Arkadelphia, AR · 2005 — present

Trajectory change can be bought deliberately, locally, and per-child — and some counties already own a working piece of the toolkit.

California's propositions — the cautionary case

California, United States · 1911 — present

Every design choice in this platform is an answer to a California failure mode.

The argument these cases add up to: our stance.